Lucy Pinder Photo Gallery Lucy Pinder Videos Index Lucy Pinder Television Website on Facebook LucyPinderNews and LPinderOfficial twitter feeds
Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum Index Facebook button Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum
Lucy Pinder - Pictures, News, Videos - The One-Stop Shop
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister (Problems? See here)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Twitter button Lucy Pinder Videos Index

Stacey Poole
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 56, 57, 58  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum Index -> Other models
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
phantomas



Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Contributions: 342
Location: Dover, UK

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:23 am    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


Her new photo set is awful. I know that BritBabeFan and lolsmasher had a long discussion about Stacey's boobs, but this time I will say that she lost clearly some boobage. Is clear to me that she lost a serious amount of weight: in her new pics you can look at her legs and they are skinnier. The bra makes her boobs look bigger, but they are smaller compared with previous shots. Her waist is smaller, and you can see on her boobs some strechtes that indicates a lost of meat...
I don' know why I think that this has to do with Morely, he got every girl that shoots hit him to lose weight...
In the end, some pics to view what I mean:

Look carefully at Stacey's legs:


And now at the right boob from the image:




And now look at her boobs and her legs:


And finally, even with her boobs squeezed you can see that her tits are smaller:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phantomas



Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Contributions: 342
Location: Dover, UK

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:26 am    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


Even if I'm wrong, and she did not lost weight, the set is awful, the pics have a low quality, everything seems so rushed in this set...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Drdee



Joined: 09 Jun 2013
Contributions: 2

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:58 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


phantomas wrote:
Even if I'm wrong, and she did not lost weight, the set is awful, the pics have a low quality, everything seems so rushed in this set...

I agree. This seems harshly lit (difficult with outdoor shoot, I grant you) and Stacey looks uncomfortable in some of the shots. This is probably going to make me unpopular with some people on here, but I think Stacey looked best back in 2011-12 when she had smaller boobs and was noticeably slimmer



Let's see how her figure continues to change
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lolsmasher



Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Contributions: 574
Location: Europe

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 4:24 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


Please. Not this again...

I don't want to come to this forum and see the same discussion every single week.

The new set is not the best, I'll give you that, mostly because of Morley's inability to realise that he can't publish colourful images in such low quality. It looks like garbage. I like the lingerie and location, though, but the poses are very unimaginative, repetitive, and by looking at the time stamps of each shot, I can see that this set took a total of 3(!) minutes to shoot, which means that the accompanying video will be roughly 6 minutes long, because it will rendered at half speed with less than half its original frame rate for the sole purpose of making it longer. I've run out of words. I think Morley may be my least favourite person on the planet. I want to enjoy his content, believe me, I do, but I just can't. Such an astoundingly unprofessional individual.

Going back to whole weight debate (sigh), no. For the umpteenth time, she has not lost weight. How many times do I need to tell you the same thing? Lighting and angles make all the difference. In this set in particular, the natural light, while mostly coming from the back/side, is also being reflected from all kinds of surfaces, so her silhouette isn't very prominent, which means that the result is going to be significantly different from a set that was shot indoors with only one major light source. Also, the background is very intense and distracting. If she were standing next to a blank wall, you probably wouldn't be complaining. Seriously, sometimes it feels like I'm lecturing children.

Time for some examples again I guess:

May 2014



May 2015



May 2016



I picked angles that are similar but with slightly varied lighting, so hopefully you'll be able to see that Stacey's body has looked pretty much the same for quite some time now.

Surely someone out there agrees with me, and if so, speak up, because it feels like I'm fighting a losing battle here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Drdee



Joined: 09 Jun 2013
Contributions: 2

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 4:50 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


lolsmasher wrote:

I picked angles that are similar but with slightly varied lighting, so hopefully you'll be able to see that Stacey's body has looked pretty much the same for quite some time now.

Surely someone out there agrees with me, and if so, speak up, because it feels like I'm fighting a losing battle here.

I'm agreeing with you on two counts Smile
2015-2016 - no appreciable weight gain/loss
The samples of images from her website don't encourage me to subscribe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lolsmasher



Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Contributions: 574
Location: Europe

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 4:58 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


Drdee wrote:
The samples of images from her website don't encourage me to subscribe


Don't. It's not worth it. Spend your money elsewhere. I'd recommend Sarah Randall's site, but she retired about a year ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AirJordanFan93



Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Contributions: 434

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 5:35 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


lolsmasher wrote:
Drdee wrote:
The samples of images from her website don't encourage me to subscribe


Don't. It's not worth it. Spend your money elsewhere. I'd recommend Sarah Randall's site, but she retired about a year ago.
I watched the video for her 2015 Christmas shoot recently. Wasn't all that exciting. Her website is under the same banner as Mel Deblings site is isn't it. Kind of like how Lucy Collett and Jodie Gasson are both under the Social Glamour umbrella.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lolsmasher



Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Contributions: 574
Location: Europe

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 5:45 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


AirJordanFan93 wrote:
Her website is under the same banner as Mel Deblings site is isn't it. Kind of like how Lucy Collett and Jodie Gasson are both under the Social Glamour umbrella.


Stacey, Melissa, Sammy, Beth (formerly) etc are all part of UK Centrefolds, which is run by Damien Morley.

There is plenty of information about UKCF and DM in this thread, so feel free to browse. You'll probably end up knowing more than you wanted to know Roll Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AirJordanFan93



Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Contributions: 434

Stacey PoolePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:55 am    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


lolsmasher wrote:
AirJordanFan93 wrote:
Her website is under the same banner as Mel Deblings site is isn't it. Kind of like how Lucy Collett and Jodie Gasson are both under the Social Glamour umbrella.


Stacey, Melissa, Sammy, Beth (formerly) etc are all part of UK Centrefolds, which is run by Damien Morley.

There is plenty of information about UKCF and DM in this thread, so feel free to browse. You'll probably end up knowing more than you wanted to know Roll Eyes
I take it he has a less than stellar reputation then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lolsmasher



Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Contributions: 574
Location: Europe

Stacey PoolePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 3:58 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


AirJordanFan93 wrote:
I take it he has a less than stellar reputation then.


You are correct.

I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify Damien Morley's species. I realised that he's not actually a mammal. Every mammal in this industry instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment, but Damien does not. He moves to an area and puts model after model behind a paywall, until every natural resource is consumed, and the only way he can survive is to spread to another area and find more models. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Damien Morley is a disease, a cancer of this industry. He is a plague, and we need a cure.

Props if you got this slightly altered quote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tungsten



Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Contributions: 244
Location: England

Stacey PoolePosted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 8:30 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


I think Stacey looks great in the latest set, and I prefer a smaller number of images as 300 - 400 with little variation is just a waste of disc space. Calling the set 'Naked Garden', I was expecting her to get fully naked and not just topless, which was a disappointment. It will be interesting to see what the next half a dozen or so sets look like, as this set is from 8th May and DM shoots a number at the same time. Will there be more outside? DM states on his Twitter that he's a publisher that still snaps occasionally, so his style won't change, he's just lazy and Stacey is probably an easy cash cow for him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BritBabeFan



Joined: 03 Nov 2014
Contributions: 591
Location: UK

Stacey PoolePosted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:01 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


a boobs-weight discussion that i didnt start hahahahahaha

joey fisher is ahead of stacey for hotness now i think, better sets wth MCG and just looks better. but stacey is still a babe.....just needs some better shoots
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lolsmasher



Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Contributions: 574
Location: Europe

Stacey PoolePosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 11:05 pm    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


This was unexpected! Wobble

https://gfycat.com/DefenselessUnhealthyCaimanlizard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scorpion



Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Contributions: 85

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:07 am    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


lolsmasher wrote:
This was unexpected! Wobble

https://gfycat.com/DefenselessUnhealthyCaimanlizard


Spinning Eyes Thud Eek!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tungsten



Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Contributions: 244
Location: England

Stacey PoolePosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:18 am    Subject: Stacey Poole Reply with quote


I messaged her on Twitter last night to ask if she'd shot with MCG yet. She replied she hasn't, so we won't be seeing her on there anytime soon it would seem Weep
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum Index -> Other models All times are GMT
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 56, 57, 58  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 56, 57, 58  Next

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Lucy Pinder News on Twitter Lucy Pinder TV on Facebook Lucy Pinder herself on Twitter


Powered by phpBB 2.0.23+repack-4 (Debian) © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
phpBB SEO