Lucy Pinder Photo Gallery Lucy Pinder Videos Index Lucy Pinder Television Website on Facebook LucyPinderNews and LPinderOfficial twitter feeds
Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum Index Facebook button Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum
Lucy Pinder - Pictures, News, Videos - The One-Stop Shop
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister (Problems? See here)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Twitter button Lucy Pinder Videos Index

Joey Fisher
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 55, 56, 57 ... 61, 62, 63  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum Index -> Other models
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
phantomas



Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Contributions: 543
Location: Dover, UK

Joey FisherPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:34 pm    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


AirJordanFan93 wrote:
rogerthat wrote:
i think joey gives peek of her pussy slight couple of times in her last mcg video.. Nuke
Pretty sure all the models who shoot for MCG have given very close hints to that region. Sadly the "Redditverse" only wants to see that.


Can you blame them? the glam industry in UK is at a dawn. Things will never be like they used at time of lads magazines. This is a period when girls are offering „private” services for the loyal fans, like seesnaps or onlyfans which in fact are the last nail in the coffin of the glam industry. So, in this mix of events the youngsters that were too little accustomed with the lads magazines era want to see fully naked pics or/and videos with these women that originally, as glam models, were never inclined to go fully naked. MCG is still respecting the glam industry canons, they offer some very sexy teasing moments with these girls, but most of the people out there on the internet dont care about what was glam industry and what standards it had, they want to see fully naked women, exposing genitals. I dont have a problem with that, if the pics or videos are made with taste. I think that there is a niche called nude photography and that it is very artistic without being vulgar or hinting at some pornish stuff. If MCG could do this kind of shift in time, they will have much to gain, but personally I dont think that the girls are prepared for this, even though they seem to have no problem with being even more audacious on their seesnaps or onlyfans accounts or even on their skype sessions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rogerthat



Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Contributions: 8

Joey FisherPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:51 pm    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


what is surprising is i never thought joey would be willing to expose her genitals this much as she did in her woodstock set and now in this latest video..she seemed to be bit shy in her nuts set and hayleys secret set..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phantomas



Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Contributions: 543
Location: Dover, UK

Joey FisherPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:03 pm    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


rogerthat wrote:
what is surprising is i never thought joey would be willing to expose her genitals this much as she did in her woodstock set and now in this latest video..she seemed to be bit shy in her nuts set and hayleys secret set..


Yes, it is surprising, but maybe she has surpassed that period. Probably she feels comfortable that at MCG she works with familiar faces (Nuts and Zoo photographers and cameramen). She even improved a bit her teasing skills, her last 3 videos are an obvious proof. Previously,she did not seem to be capable to do some teasing or proper striptease in front the camera. She was usually very poor at this in her Hayles Secrets videos or SKin tight glamour videos. She seems more confident at MCG, that's for sure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yompy777



Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Contributions: 27

Joey FisherPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:15 pm    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


Anyone got the link to the full video??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AirJordanFan93



Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Contributions: 549

Joey FisherPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 2:12 am    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


phantomas wrote:
AirJordanFan93 wrote:
rogerthat wrote:
i think joey gives peek of her pussy slight couple of times in her last mcg video.. Nuke
Pretty sure all the models who shoot for MCG have given very close hints to that region. Sadly the "Redditverse" only wants to see that.


Can you blame them? the glam industry in UK is at a dawn. Things will never be like they used at time of lads magazines. This is a period when girls are offering „private” services for the loyal fans, like seesnaps or onlyfans which in fact are the last nail in the coffin of the glam industry. So, in this mix of events the youngsters that were too little accustomed with the lads magazines era want to see fully naked pics or/and videos with these women that originally, as glam models, were never inclined to go fully naked. MCG is still respecting the glam industry canons, they offer some very sexy teasing moments with these girls, but most of the people out there on the internet dont care about what was glam industry and what standards it had, they want to see fully naked women, exposing genitals. I dont have a problem with that, if the pics or videos are made with taste. I think that there is a niche called nude photography and that it is very artistic without being vulgar or hinting at some pornish stuff. If MCG could do this kind of shift in time, they will have much to gain, but personally I dont think that the girls are prepared for this, even though they seem to have no problem with being even more audacious on their seesnaps or onlyfans accounts or even on their skype sessions.
If you have ever been to a Glam Model reddit page or just the Page3Glamour one you would know that the vast majority of people only want to see exposed pussy. I doubt most of these people are long term glam fans and honestly if they want that then they should just go and find regular pr0n as opposed to glam contnet.

I have said this many times on here but Zoo and Nuts screwed themselves out of existence by not embracing the digital revolution and in the end it cost them their existence. Offering your magazine for purchase on iOS and Android wasn't goo enough they needed to do much more than that. Things like SeeSnaps and OnlyFans substitute the income any of the big name models like Lucy or Holly would of been making from Zoo & Nuts shoots in the past. Lucy Collett has said if she didn't start SeeSnaps that she likely would of retired from modeling in 2016 because of the lost income from Zoo & Nuts.

MCG is the closest people are likely going to get in terms of full frontal nudity from a lot of these girls so either take it or leave it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phantomas



Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Contributions: 543
Location: Dover, UK

Joey FisherPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 11:40 am    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


AirJordanFan93 wrote:
phantomas wrote:
AirJordanFan93 wrote:
rogerthat wrote:
i think joey gives peek of her pussy slight couple of times in her last mcg video.. Nuke
Pretty sure all the models who shoot for MCG have given very close hints to that region. Sadly the "Redditverse" only wants to see that.


Can you blame them? the glam industry in UK is at a dawn. Things will never be like they used at time of lads magazines. This is a period when girls are offering „private” services for the loyal fans, like seesnaps or onlyfans which in fact are the last nail in the coffin of the glam industry. So, in this mix of events the youngsters that were too little accustomed with the lads magazines era want to see fully naked pics or/and videos with these women that originally, as glam models, were never inclined to go fully naked. MCG is still respecting the glam industry canons, they offer some very sexy teasing moments with these girls, but most of the people out there on the internet dont care about what was glam industry and what standards it had, they want to see fully naked women, exposing genitals. I dont have a problem with that, if the pics or videos are made with taste. I think that there is a niche called nude photography and that it is very artistic without being vulgar or hinting at some pornish stuff. If MCG could do this kind of shift in time, they will have much to gain, but personally I dont think that the girls are prepared for this, even though they seem to have no problem with being even more audacious on their seesnaps or onlyfans accounts or even on their skype sessions.
If you have ever been to a Glam Model reddit page or just the Page3Glamour one you would know that the vast majority of people only want to see exposed pussy. I doubt most of these people are long term glam fans and honestly if they want that then they should just go and find regular pr0n as opposed to glam contnet.

I have said this many times on here but Zoo and Nuts screwed themselves out of existence by not embracing the digital revolution and in the end it cost them their existence. Offering your magazine for purchase on iOS and Android wasn't goo enough they needed to do much more than that. Things like SeeSnaps and OnlyFans substitute the income any of the big name models like Lucy or Holly would of been making from Zoo & Nuts shoots in the past. Lucy Collett has said if she didn't start SeeSnaps that she likely would of retired from modeling in 2016 because of the lost income from Zoo & Nuts.

MCG is the closest people are likely going to get in terms of full frontal nudity from a lot of these girls so either take it or leave it.


Dude, calm down, you are not arguing with me here about the nudity of the girls, it's not like I'm on board with the people of reddit. Yes, Nuts and Zoo screw themself, but is not just that, we had a many glam magazines in UK, loaded, maxim, fhm, and other, the variety was good, but the digital era is taking down the traditional press, not just the glam magazines, so even if Nuts and Zoo would have struggle to keep up with the internet, I think that eventually the result would have been the same. The glam era is almost gone, so we have to accept that the things will change, so the girls have to understand that. Partially they do, working on seesnaps or onlyfans is a proof, some are doing „innocent” web shows on skype, some are selling their lingerie to the fans... so no wonder that many people want for the girls to embrace the next step: full frontal nudity. I already said that I agree with that ONLY if it's done with good taste, not vulgarizing the body of these girls. Otherwise, I'm not that enthusiastic about it.

You keep repeating that seesnap saved Lucy from retiring just because she said so. Sorry, I dont buy it! Did you ask yourself a minute if this is just her way to make even more fans, to lure them? Yeah, I can see that she can make money for some short or medium periods of time from seesnaps, but this is not a way of doing modelling. Glam Models are sometimes or often lazy, and for some of them seesnaps or other bullshits like that are the easy way to do money: showing your ass and tits at home, 1 or 2 per day in a nonprofessional way. Sorry, not my cup of tea. Being a model is even today a job that can be fruitful if you work hard and you have passion, glam models are still invited to do commercials, to work for differing advertisers, to shot with lingerie companies, to be present at all sort of sport competitions and so forth and so on. The opportunities are out there, yes, is not room for all the girls, but the best of them like Holly, Lucy vixen, Joey or Stacey can easily find different ways and collaborations to earn extra money. They can still model in the „classic” glamour way for their own sites or with the sites like OT or MCG, and in the meanwhile they can make money working as models in different contexts. But in order to do this, you have to be active, you have to stop being lazy and showing your bum on instagram or seesnaps at 12 pm when you just woke up and you dont have any mood for doing anything, but you expect money or favors from your followers or fans. I dont have a problem to subscribe to official sites, to pay for content, I earn enough money to do so if the model and her work are worthy, but I dont agree paying money to see some glam model doing some silly faces or showing a nipple on seesnaps and other apps like that because this is just unprofessional and implies an access at their private life that has to stay PRIVATE. Otherwise, eventually we will have girls offering that kind of services complaining that people dont respect their intimacy or that are being rude and harassful. They encourage a type of interaction and are offering a daring tease and than they are amazed that people want to see more and more and more... Oh, I'm ok and I look forward to interacting on instagram, to be somehow active on social media, but there is a fine limit between this and that. Also, taking pics with the phone or filiming yourself with a poo camera is so unprofessional that it can hardly could be called modelling. So, before accusing other people that they want to see full frontal nudity, you have to ask yourself if encouraging models to do this kind of services is not enhancing the desire of those how want them to show everything. Glam modelling had some limits, some standards, today those standards are off, but for this the culprits are not just the glam magazines, or some sites like OT, or the fans that are obsessed with nudity, the girls are guilty too for this situation. They had to adapt at the end of glam magazines: some of them retired, some of them are still active, but those that are active are looking up just to the shortcuts, they are not looking for real alternatives in order to remain a model... Even though I'm upset about Stacey's Poole decision to lose weight, at least she is a woman that can be admire because she always had a job apart her modelling career and she works hard to fund herself. She can be an example, if you dont find collaborations as a full time model, but you still want to model, you can work part time and do what you like and earn extra money just as Stacey does. Anyway, I wrote too much, the idea is that shouting at me or at those obsessed with nudity is not going to take you anywhere. The factors for the current situation of these glam models are far too complex to be resolved in some random discussion on a forum. Cheers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AirJordanFan93



Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Contributions: 549

Joey FisherPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:59 pm    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


phantomas wrote:
AirJordanFan93 wrote:
phantomas wrote:
AirJordanFan93 wrote:
rogerthat wrote:
i think joey gives peek of her pussy slight couple of times in her last mcg video.. Nuke
Pretty sure all the models who shoot for MCG have given very close hints to that region. Sadly the "Redditverse" only wants to see that.


Can you blame them? the glam industry in UK is at a dawn. Things will never be like they used at time of lads magazines. This is a period when girls are offering „private” services for the loyal fans, like seesnaps or onlyfans which in fact are the last nail in the coffin of the glam industry. So, in this mix of events the youngsters that were too little accustomed with the lads magazines era want to see fully naked pics or/and videos with these women that originally, as glam models, were never inclined to go fully naked. MCG is still respecting the glam industry canons, they offer some very sexy teasing moments with these girls, but most of the people out there on the internet dont care about what was glam industry and what standards it had, they want to see fully naked women, exposing genitals. I dont have a problem with that, if the pics or videos are made with taste. I think that there is a niche called nude photography and that it is very artistic without being vulgar or hinting at some pornish stuff. If MCG could do this kind of shift in time, they will have much to gain, but personally I dont think that the girls are prepared for this, even though they seem to have no problem with being even more audacious on their seesnaps or onlyfans accounts or even on their skype sessions.
If you have ever been to a Glam Model reddit page or just the Page3Glamour one you would know that the vast majority of people only want to see exposed pussy. I doubt most of these people are long term glam fans and honestly if they want that then they should just go and find regular pr0n as opposed to glam contnet.

I have said this many times on here but Zoo and Nuts screwed themselves out of existence by not embracing the digital revolution and in the end it cost them their existence. Offering your magazine for purchase on iOS and Android wasn't goo enough they needed to do much more than that. Things like SeeSnaps and OnlyFans substitute the income any of the big name models like Lucy or Holly would of been making from Zoo & Nuts shoots in the past. Lucy Collett has said if she didn't start SeeSnaps that she likely would of retired from modeling in 2016 because of the lost income from Zoo & Nuts.

MCG is the closest people are likely going to get in terms of full frontal nudity from a lot of these girls so either take it or leave it.


Dude, calm down, you are not arguing with me here about the nudity of the girls, it's not like I'm on board with the people of reddit. Yes, Nuts and Zoo screw themself, but is not just that, we had a many glam magazines in UK, loaded, maxim, fhm, and other, the variety was good, but the digital era is taking down the traditional press, not just the glam magazines, so even if Nuts and Zoo would have struggle to keep up with the internet, I think that eventually the result would have been the same. The glam era is almost gone, so we have to accept that the things will change, so the girls have to understand that. Partially they do, working on seesnaps or onlyfans is a proof, some are doing „innocent” web shows on skype, some are selling their lingerie to the fans... so no wonder that many people want for the girls to embrace the next step: full frontal nudity. I already said that I agree with that ONLY if it's done with good taste, not vulgarizing the body of these girls. Otherwise, I'm not that enthusiastic about it.

You keep repeating that seesnap saved Lucy from retiring just because she said so. Sorry, I dont buy it! Did you ask yourself a minute if this is just her way to make even more fans, to lure them? Yeah, I can see that she can make money for some short or medium periods of time from seesnaps, but this is not a way of doing modelling. Glam Models are sometimes or often lazy, and for some of them seesnaps or other bullshits like that are the easy way to do money: showing your ass and tits at home, 1 or 2 per day in a nonprofessional way. Sorry, not my cup of tea. Being a model is even today a job that can be fruitful if you work hard and you have passion, glam models are still invited to do commercials, to work for differing advertisers, to shot with lingerie companies, to be present at all sort of sport competitions and so forth and so on. The opportunities are out there, yes, is not room for all the girls, but the best of them like Holly, Lucy vixen, Joey or Stacey can easily find different ways and collaborations to earn extra money. They can still model in the „classic” glamour way for their own sites or with the sites like OT or MCG, and in the meanwhile they can make money working as models in different contexts. But in order to do this, you have to be active, you have to stop being lazy and showing your bum on instagram or seesnaps at 12 pm when you just woke up and you dont have any mood for doing anything, but you expect money or favors from your followers or fans. I dont have a problem to subscribe to official sites, to pay for content, I earn enough money to do so if the model and her work are worthy, but I dont agree paying money to see some glam model doing some silly faces or showing a nipple on seesnaps and other apps like that because this is just unprofessional and implies an access at their private life that has to stay PRIVATE. Otherwise, eventually we will have girls offering that kind of services complaining that people dont respect their intimacy or that are being rude and harassful. They encourage a type of interaction and are offering a daring tease and than they are amazed that people want to see more and more and more... Oh, I'm ok and I look forward to interacting on instagram, to be somehow active on social media, but there is a fine limit between this and that. Also, taking pics with the phone or filiming yourself with a poo camera is so unprofessional that it can hardly could be called modelling. So, before accusing other people that they want to see full frontal nudity, you have to ask yourself if encouraging models to do this kind of services is not enhancing the desire of those how want them to show everything. Glam modelling had some limits, some standards, today those standards are off, but for this the culprits are not just the glam magazines, or some sites like OT, or the fans that are obsessed with nudity, the girls are guilty too for this situation. They had to adapt at the end of glam magazines: some of them retired, some of them are still active, but those that are active are looking up just to the shortcuts, they are not looking for real alternatives in order to remain a model... Even though I'm upset about Stacey's Poole decision to lose weight, at least she is a woman that can be admire because she always had a job apart her modelling career and she works hard to fund herself. She can be an example, if you dont find collaborations as a full time model, but you still want to model, you can work part time and do what you like and earn extra money just as Stacey does. Anyway, I wrote too much, the idea is that shouting at me or at those obsessed with nudity is not going to take you anywhere. The factors for the current situation of these glam models are far too complex to be resolved in some random discussion on a forum. Cheers!


First off I wasn't posting my last post in a angry mindset.

I wouldn't call Maxim a Glam Mag. FHM covered enough models and mentioned them enough for them to be considered one and I beleieve they were published by the same company that published Zoo. Print Media would of died by that doesn't mean Zoo or Nuts would of had to die. Then you do online subscription services like Social Glamour or something along those lines and I would be willing to bet that a Zoo or Nuts service with the models they had would of done very well in terms of subscriber numbers.

As for Lucy again its a thing she has said a few times on her Snap and since I am likely the only one here who has access to it then I am the only one who knows for sure. When she first launched it people were annoyed and she said she needed the money to pay bills. Given she doesn't have work outside of modeling I don't think she was making a good amount of money from just her website and Page3. Again I don't know how much Page3 pays her or how much she gets from her website subscriptions. I doubt its just a ploy to get subscribers either since she has only really said it on SnapChat which you can only see once you pay to subscribe. I think if her Twitch streams made money she probably wouldn't of got a SeeSnaps account.

Things like SeeSnaps and OnlyFans are better defined as "extras" for hardcore fans of said model as opposed to a replacement for a traditional website or whatever else. It allows the subscriber bonus content of the girl and in some cases a way to communicate with them if they decide to respond to messages. How many other models are doing traditional model work outside of Glam though. I know Holly has done Lingerie stuff for companies Lucy has as well though I don't think she has since 2015. The only models I know whom have work outside of modeling are Stacey since it was mentioned in her thread and Charlotte Springer. Maybe that is the better way to go about it and treat modeling as a side-job.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AirJordanFan93



Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Contributions: 549

Joey FisherPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 11:33 pm    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


Joey FIsher Page3 Bonus Pics January 2017

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HMSBaz



Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Contributions: 8

Joey FisherPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 10:18 am    Subject: Recent MCG Video Reply with quote


Anyone got her latest video from MCG, cheers in advance Big Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rogerthat



Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Contributions: 8

Joey FisherPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 4:33 pm    Subject: Re: Recent MCG Video Reply with quote


HMSBaz wrote:
Anyone got her latest video from MCG, cheers in advance Big Smile

there has been no video uploaded of joey recently..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yompy777



Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Contributions: 27

Joey FisherPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:29 am    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


I have two of her latest videos but each time i upload them, they get deleted
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AirJordanFan93



Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Contributions: 549

Joey FisherPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:32 am    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


You people do realize MayContainGirl remove their videos pretty much as soon as they are posted anywhere right. They are probably the best at having their content removed from certain sites.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BobJonz1



Joined: 06 Oct 2016
Contributions: 99

Joey FisherPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:09 am    Subject: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


Yes--sadly I've figured that out as well. It used to be possible to find the MCG vids out there but now it isn't. So sad! Started noticing it with Joey's "Lets get physical" video and haven't really been able to track any down since then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rogerthat



Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Contributions: 8

Joey FisherPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:35 am    Subject: Re: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


Yompy777 wrote:
I have two of her latest videos but each time i upload them, they get deleted


you should give some random name to it and tell people here when you upload them quickly..small window of opportunity is all we need.. Big Laugh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lilmo89



Joined: 07 Jul 2013
Contributions: 53

Joey FisherPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:56 pm    Subject: Re: Joey Fisher Reply with quote


rogerthat wrote:
Yompy777 wrote:
I have two of her latest videos but each time i upload them, they get deleted


you should give some random name to it and tell people here when you upload them quickly..small window of opportunity is all we need.. Big Laugh


They're probably watching this forum as well, unfortunately! Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lucy Pinder Television Website Forum Index -> Other models All times are GMT
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 55, 56, 57 ... 61, 62, 63  Next
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 55, 56, 57 ... 61, 62, 63  Next

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Lucy Pinder News on Twitter Lucy Pinder TV on Facebook Lucy Pinder herself on Twitter


Powered by phpBB 2.0.23+repack-4 (Debian) © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
phpBB SEO